Dubspeed Driven Road Test – The Mercedes-Benz E320 CDI: Diesel Power – trumping the hybrid hype


Click To View Larger Image

Text by Dubspeed Media Staff, Carl Modesette and Zerin Dube
Photos by Zerin Dube and Matt Chow, additional photos by respective manufacturers

As fuel prices in the United States continue to rise, consumers are beginning to direct their attention further away from traditional gas-guzzling family trucksters and more towards alternatives that are actually halfway economical. The problem is, at least in this writer’s humble opinion, that the media (and industry) buzz is focused solely around hybrids. While certainly a viable and increasingly available option, little if any attention is being paid to other alternatives, namely diesels. Thus, when the opportunity to sample Mercedes’ latest offering presented itself in the form of the 2006 E320 CDI, we jumped at the chance.


Click To View Larger Image

While our 2006 model test car is new, Mercedes is no stranger to the diesel passenger-car market. In fact, Mercedes introduced the world’s first diesel passenger car, the 260D, in 1936. Just 20 years ago, 75% of Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the United States were diesels. Introduced in the US in 2004, the CDI has enjoyed much success due to its outstanding fuel efficiency and performance.


Click To View Larger Image

Rather unassuming in appearance, our test car isn’t visually distinguishable from its gasoline-powered brethren save for the discreet CDI badge on the rear decklid. CDI is Mercedes-speak for Common-Rail Direct Injection, a fuel-injection system that electronically maintains a constant level of high fuel pressure (23,300 psi!) in each of the engine’s six injector valves. This type of system softens diesel power pulses, resulting in smoother, quieter, and more powerful performance, according to M-B.


Click To View Larger Image

Upon turning the ignition key, you’re aware that there’s a diesel under the hood by the telltale diesel clatter, but the noise is certainly not obtrusive. After a few minutes of warm-up, this clatter subsides, and engine noise is no more intrusive than traditional gasoline engines. Once underway, it doesn’t take long to discover the mammoth strength of this CDI engine. Rated at 369 lb-ft of torque, available from 1800-2600 rpm, it pulls authoritatively away from a standstill with only moderate throttle application. While certainly entertaining, the real beauty of the CDI’s torque curve is found in the subtleties of everyday driving – merging into freeway traffic, passing, and exiting parking lots onto busy thoroughfares. Instead of mashing the go-pedal to the floor, waiting for several downshifts, and praying for the best as the tachometer swings wildly toward redline, simply roll lightly into the throttle and let the torque take care of business. This is quite a paradigm shift from traditional gasoline engines that build power and torque as RPM’s rise. Marketing that focuses on lofty horsepower figures – which look great on paper – fails to take into account the real-world tractability of torque.


Click To View Larger Image

Torque aside, the true calling of the E320 CDI is improved fuel economy. EPA estimates of 27 mpg city and 37 mpg highway compare quite favorably to the gasoline-powered E350’s 19/27 figures. In mixed city and highway driving I observed anywhere from 25-28 mpg, and on the open highway, I found it difficult to get any worse than 30 mpg. Either way, range is incredible considering the 21.1 gal tank – it’s actually feasible to make it from Houston to El Paso on a single tank of fuel! Using the EPA city estimates for fuel consumption and driving 15,000 miles per year, the CDI will consume 234 gallons LESS fuel than the E350. At current prices, that results in nearly $600 annual fuel savings. Considering that the price differential for the CDI is only $1,000 more than the base E350 (E320 CDI price-as-tested of $55,465) , the economics are a no-brainer.

And what of the hybrids? Let’s compare two popular models: the 2006 Honda Civic Hybrid and the 2006 Ford Escape Hybrid:

The Escape Hybrid offers 155 horsepower and 124 ft-lb of torque, and EPA figures of 36 city / 31 highway for a base MSRP of $27,515. The base Escape offers 153 horsepower and 152 ft-lb of torque, and EPA figures of 22 city / 26 highway for a base MSRP of $19,995. Using EPA city estimates for fuel consumption and driving 15,000 miles per year, the Hybrid will save 265 gallons of fuel, translating into $663 annual fuel savings.

The Civic Hybrid offers 110 horsepower and 123 ft-lb of torque, and EPA figures of 49 city / 51 highway for a base MSRP of $21,850. The base Civic offers 140 horsepower and 128 ft-lb of torque, and EPA figures of 30 city / 40 highway for a base MSRP of $15,360. Using EPA city estimates for fuel consumption and driving 15,000 miles per year, the Hybrid will save 294 gallons of fuel, translating into $735 annual fuel savings.

On the surface, things look great – both hybrids appear to conserve between 250 and 300 gallons of fuel yearly, translating into an average of $700 yearly fuel savings. However, note carefully the price differential – the Hybrid Escape comes at a $7520 price premium, and the Civic Hybrid comes at a $6490 price premium. Even with the $2000 one-time Federal Income Tax deduction for Hybrids, the cost of entry is rather steep. Also keep in mind that horsepower and torque are, at best, only comparable to standard models. All of a sudden, it’s not so easy being green.


Click To View Larger Image

So if diesels are so great, why don’t we see more of them on the road…or in dealer’s lots? The primary obstacle in diesel progress has been emissions – particulates and oxides of nitrogen, in particular (if you’ll forgive the pun). Already prevalent in Europe, low-sulfur diesel fuel (15 ppm) is key in facilitating lower emissions (current diesel fuel in the US is 500 ppm). The good news for stateside diesels is that this fuel should become available in the US near the end of 2006. My prediction is that we’ll start seeing many more diesel powerplant options from more and more manufacturers shortly thereafter. In fact, J.D. Power and Associates predicts that the diesel passenger car market in the US, currently at 3.4%, will quadruple by 2015. In Europe, diesels currently account for more than 50% of the market. Volkswagen and Mercedes already offer diesel powerplants in passenger cars, and the Big Three have been very successful with their diesel-powered trucks. GM, Ford, Honda, and Nissan are all reportedly investigating diesel technology for both cars and trucks.


Click To View Larger Image

The E320 CDI might not be the best thing since sliced bread, and certainly won’t single-handedly change the face of worldwide conservation efforts, but what it stands for is much bigger than that. It represents an outside-the-box thought process that’s focused on refining and perfecting existing technology instead of leaping off the deep end into uncharted technological waters. In the words of Mercedes, diesel technology offers excellent economy, longevity, and robustness without compromising on driving enjoyment. I never liked changing spark plugs anyway.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

13 comments to Dubspeed Driven Road Test – The Mercedes-Benz E320 CDI: Diesel Power – trumping the hybrid hype

  • Shaan

    It is certainly nice to see an attractive and powerful sedan powered by a diesel here in the states. Now if we can get the twin turbo Audi A8 diesel and get these emissions issues taken care of I will be totally happy.

  • Daniel Abranko

    I’m happy that more americans are discovering and showcasing the fact that modern diesel powered vehicles (cars in particular,) are an excellent alternative to gasoline only and even gasoline hybrid cars for fuel efficient, environmentally friendly transport. Modern emissions reduction and computer controlled engine technology has enabled a new generation of diesels which not only run quieter than ever, but the newest diesels even produce lower emissions than their gasoline counterparts.
    I’m sad though, that Toyota, Honda and other manufacturers which sell extremely efficient diesel powered compact cars in europe. Hopefully these manufacturers will come around soon…

  • the best one everrrrrrrrrrrrrr !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

  • mike hardage

    Zerin

    I drove one of these for a month; amazing car! Great power; I got about 32mpg at 90mph highway on trips; about 26-27 around the neighborhood with a lead foot. The car would spin the rear tires when I jumped on the throttle to get out of someone’s way.

    Good article

  • jimmy dean

    Errr… I wouldn’t say diesels are CLEANER than gas counterparts. Cleaner than the gasoline engines of several years ago yes. But emissions are a moving target and diesels have difficulty with particulates and NOx even with all the current tech.

    That being said the newer generation of catalysts being developed promises to make the EPA happy and match the emissions of gasoline motors. And using biodiesel drops pollutants even further.

    I drove the C-class diesel in Europe and achieved a Prius like 42mpg average no matter how hard I mashed the throttle. Even though it has less power than the tested E320 it was still a hell of a lot more fun to drive than a Prius. And not that much more expensive!

    Now if only M-B would bring those smooth shifting 6-speed manuals they put on their European offerings…. HELLO!

  • CCCheung

    I had a 1999 Jetta TDI, chipped and driven like crazy. 40 mpg city, 50 mpg highway with no problem. Sold it for half price after 4 years. The buyer took it to Portugal or somewhere.

    The 2006 is a must buy for diesel loving Americans. This is the last sensible Benz without the new for 2007 “triple converter”, urea injected Blue Tec with the turbo sitting in the valley of a 100% alloy V6! The design is flawed. To get at the engine you have to remove the turbo. Can you imagine the repair costs for the 3 filters and urea filling in a Mercedes dealership? They are talking also about disabling the engine and/or turbo to obligate new diesel owners to fill up their urea tanks. Big Brother diesel technology. I have a lot of urea for them in the form of human urine.

  • Bart

    The problem in the US is that the emission rates have to be very low for diesel cars. In Europe you see a lot of diesel powered car, they are very competitive with there petrol equivillants for example the BMW 535d.

  • Donan Iacovone

    I own one diesel, a Volkswagen, that gets 45 mpg. I am planning on buying another diesel. I am happy to see more choices entering the U.S. marketplace. I am awaiting the hybrid diesel to make it to the public. I expect cars achieving 65-80 mpg with such technologies combined. I would venture a guess to say that there will be such a vehicle sold in the U.S. by 2010.

  • david

    Just traded a 2006 CLS500 for a 2006 E320CDI. (I know, two very different cars. The CLS — for me, at least — while beautiful standing outside looking at it, was just not beautiful enough when behind the wheel. Ride too stiff and rough, and noisy, all thanks probably to the Z-rated tires, which I had to replace — the rear ones — at just 10,000 miles.)

    Anyway, the CDI is a revelation. Yes, I feel “smarter” as I drive past the pumps. Yes, it has a much more comfortable ride, and easier to get in and out of, as well. But the eye-opener is the useful power. It is a fact that the 303hp V8 in the CLS and the 202hp in-line six in the CDI produce the identical pound-feet of torque: 380. And I can report that the diesel has comparable pickup and performance to the CLS. Where it really shines is the passing acceleration range, from 50 to 80.

    I drove a 1990 300CE for 12 years, and loved the low-end torque of the in-line six, the old MB “iron horse”. I’m delighted to be reunited with this worthy engine block in the CDI.

  • Joe Casale

    I very much enjoyed your article. I have had two M.B. deisels over the years. I am now in my tenth year with a 1997 S420. It has 173,400 miles on it, and runs superbly. The fuel mileage on the road at 80 mph is close to 25 mpg.

    I AM WAITING FOR THE BLUE TECH DEISEL MODEL BEFORE I GIVE UP MY S CLASS.

    Do you have any idea when it will be available? Also in New York you can’t refister a deisel unless it already has 7500 miles on it. Will the new low particulate fuel( now available) change that? Thanks.

  • John Pauley

    I own it. I love it. finest piece of technology ever driven and i’ve owned mb cars for 25 years.

  • Sindelfingen, GER

    Close, but…..the current process pioneered by DaimlerChrysler AG requires a complex system and heavy add-ons to generate ammonia from urea-based additives, other manufacturers currently have methods that generate and store ammonia within a two-layer catalytic converter to turn nitrogen oxide into harmless nitrogen. Mercedes needs to get on board… MBZ next-generation diesels are scheduled for a 2008 launch…

    2007 CL500

  • Greg

    I have a e320 CDI and love it. I get 35 mpg at 80 mph on trips

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

-->