• Home
  • Photo Gallery
  • Avoidable Contact
  • Speed:Sport:Life Radio
  • Contact

Dubspeed Driven Road Test: 2006 Ford Fusion SEL

Zerin Dube | July 23, 2006


Click To View Larger Image

Story by Dubspeed Driven Contributor, Adam Barrera
Photos courtesy of Ford Motor Company

Twenty years ago, flush-mounted, replaceable-bulb halogen headlamps brought the exotic science of aerodynamics to mainstream tangibility in a midsize sedan called the Ford Taurus. The radical Taurus became an American staple almost instantly, and continued to bring innovation to the masses in its years as the nation’s best-selling car.

When Ford was faced with the challenge of redesigning the third-generation Taurus in 1996, the car’s overly ovoid exterior styling was more controversial than groundbreaking. Sales slipped, and the car lost its best-seller crown. The fourth-generation Taurus apologized for its predecessor’s styling by donning completely anonymous sheetmetal that neither stirred nor offended. The bland Taurus was no longer a powerhouse to be reckoned with, but Ford wasn’t about to give up the midsize crown without a fight.


Click To View Larger Image

In order to remain relevant in the segment it reinvented, Ford couldn’t risk launching a less-than-perfect successor to the Taurus. Rather than develop a new sedan from scratch, Ford opted to build on the successful Mazda6 platform.

And Ford did build. The Fusion is not just a badge-engineered Mazda. Its track was widened by an inch to further minimize body roll. The wheelbase was also lengthened by 2.1 inches, translating into an additional half an inch of rear legroom and 0.6 cubic feet of additional trunk space.


Click To View Larger Image

Peer inside, and you’d never suspect that the two cars were related. Piano black accents and an analog clock in the center stack exude a more mature attitude than the Mazda6, but the same attention to quality is apparent. Sounds emitted from power windows, seat motors, and door locks convey a sense of precision engineering.

When you tilt the Fusion’s power driver’s seat on three axes and finally find the right driving position, the interior suddenly becomes a cockpit. The driver’s seat boasts several degrees of lumbar support that cater to a wide audience of uncomfortable backs. Spirited drivers will find the side bolsters encouraging, though lateral thigh support is somewhat disappointing. The leather grain is not as supple as an Accord’s, but the upholstery does feel durable and is soft enough to soothe nerves during a lengthy freeway commute. Backseat passengers of all sizes will enjoy the supportive seats and generous legroom if you’re inspired to take a long backroad home instead.

Some manufacturers’ steering wheels are entirely too thick for the simple sake of being thick, but the Fusion’s wheel is easy to grasp and comfortable enough to hold for hours at a time. However, the leather wrap is noticeably thin. In our test car, the stitching was beginning to fray in the 10-and-2 thumb notches. With a little practice, the wheel-mounted cruise, climate, and audio controls provide predictable responses and are never prone to accidental presses.


Click To View Larger Image

Cupholders abound. There are three within reach of the driver, including one cleverly placed in the door’s map pocket. A shallow compartment above the center stack is intended to house mobile electronics, and nicely augments storage space in the center console. Non-slip grip pads line most storage surfaces, and are easily removable for cleaning.


Click To View Larger Image

Seas of green illumination detract from the interior’s ambiance at night. Gauges remain clear and easy to read, but controls in the center stack blend into one another. Even the analog clock is backlit in green. The classy centerpiece deserves better than a hue that has long been associated with spartan interiors.


Click To View Larger Image

An unmistakable sense of bold American presence can be felt when you first spot the Fusion in a parking lot full of copycat midsize sedans. Approach the front of the car, and your eyes will immediately be drawn to the huge blue Ford badge proudly centered in a backdrop of three thick chrome bars. Ford’s unique New Edge design language may have grown mature, but it hasn’t lost its impact.


Click To View Larger Image

Rear styling is even more of a departure from segment norms. Enthusiasts familiar with the Australian-market Ford Falcon will love the dramatically steep rake of the Fusion’s rear decklid. The chrome-ringed taillamps owe their sharp edges to the European Ford Mondeo. A three-quarter view of the Fusion’s rear end is an unmistakable tribute to the foreign Fords that never reach our shores. It’s the perfect complement to the all-American front end, and lends a global touch to the car’s cosmopolitan flair.

Under the hood, the Fusion is equipped to back up its looks. Variable valve timing helps the 3.0-liter Duratec 30 V6 produce 221 horsepower and 205 pound-feet of torque. In comparison, the V8-powered Taurus SHO delivered only 14 more ponies and weighed 162 pounds more than the Fusion. Power delivery is predictable and smooth, if not athletic. Ask this car to move, and it will confidently propel you past frumpy people movers and into the left lane.


Click To View Larger Image

Only the steadiest right foot can suppress the spastic stoplight-to-stoplight nature of the standard six-speed automatic transmission, which is overeager to downshift in city driving. In town, gas mileage suffers because of the transmission’s indecision. City trips averaged 16 mpg.

Merge onto the freeway, and the gearbox begins to shine. At higher speeds, the transmission is just as eager to deliver buttery downshifts that seamlessly bring the engine back into the powerband. Once you’ve reached cruising speed, the tall sixth gear ratio silences the engine and maximizes fuel economy. On the highway, the Fusion averaged 25.6 mpg. Bold moves behind the wheel will reward you with a surprisingly melodic engine note that is just audible enough in the cabin to be exciting, but not intrusive.

Double wishbone suspension up front joins an independent multilink setup in the rear to create sharp turn-in and balanced cornering. The setup is reined in by conservative damping to ensure comfortable cruising over bumpy roads.

The SEL’s 17-inch aluminum wheels are wrapped in P225/50VR Michelin Pilot MXM4 tires that deliver above-average grip at the cost of above-average road noise. The tires track straight on slick surfaces and maintain composure through unexpected puddles.

Beefy disc brakes at each corner are ready to shed speed on a short exit ramp. The optional antilock braking system with electronic brakeforce distribution brings added stability in panic stop situations, but should be standard in this segment and at this price point.

The most important décor inside the Fusion is the collection of “Airbag” labels displayed throughout the cabin. Conventional driver and front-passenger airbags are joined by side curtain and seat-mounted airbags that protect the head and torso. This inflatable cocoon of safety was an option on our test car, but will become standard on every 2007 model year Fusion.

There is one safety and security concern. The Fusion’s keyless entry transmitter is embedded in the master key. The panic and trunk release buttons are not recessed and do not require a prolonged press to actuate. Accidentally popping the trunk when you’re already on your front porch is an annoyance when detected, and a security risk if unnoticed.


Click To View Larger Image

Competitors’ keyless entry systems are designed with lockouts to prevent this sort of mishap. Even the Mazda6’s system is more guarded. The Five Hundred’s identical system proves that this is a Ford family trait — and it is nothing to brag about.

Although this problem is somewhat serious, it could easily be addressed by production staff. Such a minuscule problem is a far cry from the problems that plagued domestic manufacturers in the past.

Building a good car is hardly revolutionary — indeed, it is to be expected. In that sense, the Fusion is no trailblazer. But it is a sign that Ford still has a passion for — and is competitive in — the segment that they reinvented in 1986.

Specifications
Engine
Type: V6, aluminum block/heads
Displacement cu in (cc): 181.1 cu inch
Power bhp at RPM (SAE Net): 221 hp /
6250 rpm
Torque lb-ft at RPM: 205 lb-ft
/ 4800 rpm
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: 11.8-in vented disc; 11.0-in disc, ABS
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 190.2 x 72.2 x 57.2 in
Weight lb : 3280
Performance
Acceleration 0-60 mph: 7.5
Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg : 21/29

Base price - $21,710

Price as-tested - $26,445

Categories
News, Reviews and Road Tests, Speed:Sport:Life Original Content
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« KW Suspensions - Historical Le Mans Grand Prix Volvo Releases First Photos of the Production C30 »

15 responses

[...] tos courtesy of Ford Motor Company Twenty years ago,

Dubspeed Driven Road Test: 2006 Ford Fusion SEL » Wagalulu - Technorati’s Top Tags » » Dubspeed Driven Road Test: 2006 Ford Fusion SEL | July 23, 2006

[…] tos courtesy of Ford Motor Company Twenty years ago, flush-mounted… Original post by […]

Nice review. One point of clarification: the Lincoln

Mike | July 23, 2006

Nice review. One point of clarification: the Lincoln Mark VII was the first car sold in the US with composite headlamps, preceding the Taurus by two years in MY 1984. In fact, Ford petitioned the US DOT to change the headlight rule specificially for this car, because without the smooth front clip, it would be hard to tell it from its stablemate, the Ford Thunderbird.

That's true, Mike, but I'm not sure if the Mark

Adam | July 24, 2006

That’s true, Mike, but I’m not sure if the Mark VII was considered “mainstream”. The Taurus brought flush headlamps to an “everymom” segment. There was a bravery in that, and I hope we see that sort of innovation from Dearborn again soon.

Nice writeup, looks like a good car, it is in

Baron | July 26, 2006

Nice writeup, looks like a good car, it is in contention for my money should the need arise for a new car.

What a well written review on an intriguing car. I

Chris Watkins | July 26, 2006

What a well written review on an intriguing car. I am definitely going to consider this for my next purchase, and well as investigate other Ford products, all thanks to this review. I hope Ford continues to provide opportunities like this in the future, particularly with the Shelby GT500 and the Ford GT. Reviews on these cars could definitely cause me to consider purchasing one or even both.

It doesn't look bad, but it doens't look exceptional either.

Ronnie | July 26, 2006

It doesn’t look bad, but it doens’t look exceptional either. For that kind of money I’d buy another VW or a Mazda.

Chris, I've driven both. Here are a couple of quickies

Adam | July 27, 2006

Chris, I’ve driven both. Here are a couple of quickies for you.

You can build the GT500 with a stock Mustang GT and a Jeg’s catalog.

The Ford GT will turn you into an attractive man. A polygamist. And yet, somehow, you’ll find religion, too.

Hope those help.

Wow, cars like this would have me actually look

Steve Mikula | July 27, 2006

Wow, cars like this would have me actually look at a Ford, and, or domestics again!

Agreed on the GT-500 comment but getting the package for

Matt | July 31, 2006

Agreed on the GT-500 comment but getting the package for the price and the Ford GT block that is in the GT-500 is not easy; it is iron not aluminum. And I like the cmment about the GT Adam, very true.

Great review. I just bought one for the wife

Chris | August 13, 2006

Great review. I just bought one for the wife today. We bought the V6 SEL and just like you said, if you tell it to go, it listens. I love the analog clock, and it is just as roomy as a Camry or Accord. We researched all three before we came to the decision to buy. The only dislike, and it’s only cosmetic, is that you do not have an option for a rear spoiler.

If Ford doesn't provide a spoiler, the aftermarket will. Still,

Michael Karesh | September 26, 2006

If Ford doesn’t provide a spoiler, the aftermarket will. Still, spoilers on mainstream sedans are a fad that has largely spent itself. These days you mainly see spoilers on the most prosaic sedans, like champagne Toyota Camrys with the gold package.

I generally like the look of the Fusion, but find myself disliking the tail lamps more every time I see them. Luckily, they will likely be changed with the refresh, probably in 2008 or 2009.

To see how the Fusion’s price compares to the competition, visit my site’s page for the car by clicking on my name above.

[...] iting for the outlets that have already taken a

high mileage | November 12, 2006

[…] iting for the outlets that have already taken a chance on me. If you’ve not yet read my review of the Ford Fusion at Dubspeed Dri […]

The Mercury Version (Milan) is a very nice vehicle

Mike | December 20, 2006

The Mercury Version (Milan) is a very nice vehicle too. Michael, if you don’t like

the tail lights on the Fusion take a look at the Milan. Its very sharp.

I Went an looked at a Ford Fusion and it

Johnny | January 17, 2007

I Went an looked at a Ford Fusion and it is a nice front end but the rest of the car is so FU%$#ing Uguly i could VOMIT!! It has a Shit engine too.

I have to comment on your excellent writing style and

Ace | May 26, 2007

I have to comment on your excellent writing style and word use. In many cases it is almost poetic. Your desctiptions are very fluid and create many colorful pictures in my mind as I read them. One minor thing, I noticed 3 times in the review you refer to lbs-ft. for torque. All references to torque I have ever seen always are designated as ft-lbs, or foot-pounds. See defiinition at this link - http://www.oddparts.com/acsi/defines/torque.htm

Thanks again for a very graphic and enjoyable review.

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


Featured Videos

Audi R8 at MSR Houston
Audi R8 at MSR Houston
Viper Carsickness
Viper Carsickness

S:S:L Partner

Recent Posts

  • Driver Loses Life At 24 Hours of Lemons at Altamont - Speed:Sport:Life Team Finishes 15th of 90 Entrants
  • Speed:Sport:Life Radio Mini-Cast: Liar Liar Pants On Fire Edition
  • Not Speed:Sport:Life Radio: Summa Cum Laude Edition
  • News Flash! We Drive the 2009 Audi A4
  • Speed:Sport:Life Radio: All Work and No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy Edition

Navigation

  • Speed:Sport:Life Original Content
    • Avoidable Contact
    • Speed:Sport:Life Radio
    • Event Coverage
    • Reviews and Road Tests
  • Speed:Sport:Life Racing
  • News
    • Industry News
    • Model News
    • Motorsports News
    • News from Around the Web
  • International Auto Shows
    • 2008 North American International Auto Show
    • 2008 NYIAS
    • 2008 New York International Auto Show
    • 2008 NAIAS
    • 2008 Detroit Auto Show
    • 2007 Los Angeles Auto Show
    • 2007 Detroit Auto Show
    • 2007 North American International Auto Show
    • 2008 Chicago Auto Show
    • 2007 NAIAS
    • 2007 LA Auto Show
    • 2007 Chicago Auto Show
    • 2007 New York International Auto Show
    • 2005 Frankfurt International Auto Exhibition
    • 39th Tokyo Motor Show
    • 2005 SEMA Show
    • 2006 North American International Auto Show (Detroit)
    • 2005 Essen Motor Show
    • 2006 NAIAS ( Detroit Auto Show )
    • 2006 Los Angeles Auto Show
    • 2006 Geneva Motor Show
    • 2006 Chicago Auto Show
    • 2006 New York International Auto Show
    • 2006 Paris Motor Show
    • 2006 SEMA Show
  • Items of Interest
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox
Podcast Powered by podPress (v8.7)