• Reviews and Road Tests
  • Buyer Guides
  • Editorial Content
    • Avoidable Contact
    • Event Coverage
    • Lord Byron
    • Racer Boy
    • Rational Bohemian
Speed:Sport:Life
  • Reviews and Road Tests
  • Buyer Guides
  • Editorial Content
    • Avoidable Contact
    • Event Coverage
    • Lord Byron
    • Racer Boy
    • Rational Bohemian

Unsafe at Any Speed: Top Gear Mag Crash Tests G-Wiz EV, Car Fails Miserably

  • May 11, 2007
  • Kasey Kagawa
Home › Model News › Unsafe at Any Speed: Top Gear Mag Crash Tests G-Wiz EV, Car Fails Miserably

Post by Kasey Kagawa

For those of you not familiar with the vagaries of the UK’s efforts to stop their citizens from killing themselves through the burning of fossil fuels, there’s a congestion charge program in effect in some cities, including London. If you want to drive in certain areas of London between prescribed hours, you need to pony up £8 to the government. It’s supposed to encourage people to use public transportation more and lessen traffic problems, but mostly what you hear in praise of it is that it’s saving the lives of Arctic baby seals and earning lot of money for the city, so it’s not that hard to deduce what the real motivation behind it is. (Oh, and if you live in New York City, they’re after your wallets too.) There’s a few exceptions to these rules, including buses, taxis, emergency vehicles, and alternative fuel vehicles like hybrids and electric cars.

One of the more popular electric cars being used in the streets of London is the G-Wiz, a small two-seater car imported from India. It’s been getting some good buzz as of late, and has been held up as proof that electric cars work well in urban settings. Top Gear’s never been a big fan of electric cars, and they’ve taken it upon themselves see just how safe these proposed urban runabouts really are. Following EuroNCAP crash test standards, they simulated a head-on impact with another car at a combined speed of 60 MPH, and the results were disappointing to say the least. According to TRL, the agency that performed the test, “the passenger compartment sustained significant intrusion with the driver’s side A-pillar deforming rearwards by approximately 397mm at the waist beam level. At the sill level the A-pillar deformed rearwards by approximately 299mm. Intrusion of this magnitude has the potential to cause serious or life-threatening injuries to the vehicle occupants as structures such as the steering column and pedals intrude into the compartment,” all things that sound very bad. It’s a good job that these cars were tested as the results of this impact could have been critical. People want to feel safe in their cars and not unprotected if they find themselves in a collision. If people are seriously hurt in a car accident, then they may be able to file a claim with a law firm to help with any medical bills that they may have. Not forgetting that they could also receive compensation for damages to your car if it has been severely damaged. The fact that these cars were tested first may have just helped to save a life. The car gets away with this poor showing by not actually being classified as a car. Technically, due to its slow speed and light weight, it’s a quadricycle under UK law. Still, two cars closing on each other at around 30 MPH each doesn’t sound like an unreasonable occurrence, even in the city, so to have it fare so poorly in the crash test offsets the extra eight pounds a day I’d save, in my opinion. Hit the link below for a photo gallery and high-speed camera footage of the test.

Electric shock [Top Gear]

Kasey Kagawa

Previous Article

Video of the Week: Grand Prix Footage, The Way Mom Used To Make It

  • May 5, 2007
  • Kasey Kagawa
View Post
Next Article

Video of the Week: Final Exams Edition

  • May 12, 2007
  • Kasey Kagawa
View Post

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

© 2026 Speed:Sport:Life. All Rights Reserved. | contact@speedsportlife.com | X/Twitter · Instagram · Bluesky

Input your search keywords and press Enter.